Exhaust Port Shape & Timing

How Much Duration is TOO MUCH ?

(The Lower the Exhaust Timing, the MORE Low End - WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!)

Introduction:

After a phone conversation a few days ago, I decided to provide a fact to you which I learned this Winter. I was asked: "How much can you raise the exhaust duration without giving away to much low end?" "I have ALWAYS believed that the higher the exhaust timing the less low end the engine will provide." This seemed reasonable, so I never questioned it. I now know that this was BS ( someone showing how much (little) they knew). An engine has an area where it is MOST EFFICIENT in its Exhaust Open Duration AND in its Intake Open Duration. Note: In the NEW ENGINE ANALYSIS PROGRAM, "duration time" is provided for the chosen timing.

Terminology: (Duration - open time of the exhaust port or the intake port)

How then can we decide what is the most efficient duration of any given engine? Very difficult without the availability of a dynamometer for testing, or a LOT of on the water guessing. The group of people that I spend my Winter Testing time with (John Ackerman, Brian Callahan, Joe Kramer, Norris Sparks and Bobby Coleman) have found out the answer to these questions. Here are those answers......

Exhaust timing:

The exhaust timing that we have found works the best is between 187 and 192 degrees of open time (duration). The lower being for 21 engines and the higher for 90 and 1 cu in engines. It is vital to be sure that for the increase in duration, you also increase the compression ratio and lengthen the pipe. The result will be BOTH an increase in HP and Torque!!!!

The shape of RAISED exhaust port we have found best is like this:


Intake Timing:

I have always felt secure that the intake timing that I have used for years was as good as I could choose. I have been persuaded this past Winter that this is incorrect. I previously used 123-124 degrees for ALL engine sizes. Now I have found without any doubt that intakes at 128 degrees will produce both more torque and more hp. I haven't tried really high intakes 132+ yet, but maybe I will also be persuaded that this better. Until that time, 128 works great! I believe that the open duration of the intakes was to short to allow filling and emptying of the charge!

Dyno Testing:


Our current BEST results are as follows:

21 Nova Rossi Long Stroke, D&J Carb, 65% Nitro, Norris Sparks 3.21 HP 110 Torque
45 Picco EXR, OS Drum & Carb, 65% Nitro, John Ackerman 5.72 HP 216 Torque
67 Picco EXR, OS Drum & Carb, 65% Nitro, Steve Ball 6.89 HP 346 Torque
90 Russian K90, 60% Nitro, Bobby Coleman 7.48 HP 358 Torque

Remember that the fuel/air mixture is the main coolant for the engine. Keep the mixture on the rich side of the needle and you will see consistent performance and longer engine life. You don't need to burn a plug every run to know that your engine is performing correctly. I try to stay on that rich side of the needle (with the correct compression ratio), I keep the plug, and I get the performance.


 

IMPORTANT NOTE: All the registered owners of "The Engine Analysis Program" please send me an e-mail indicating your name and e-mail address. I have continuing important testing information that I want make you aware of.

Be sure to get your copy of The Engine Analysis Software. This WILL be the best engine tool you will EVER buy!

"Old Tech Notes" - Click Here !

To DOWNLOAD Free Software - Click Here !

Copyright © 1998 MWD & Associates
URL http://rcboat.com/
Most recent update 4/30/98
For more information contact webmaster-
mdavis76@tampabay.rr.com